Senate Questions State Dept Over Internet Freedom Fund
Hillary sitting on millions rather than give it to anti-censorship work
The ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee wants to know why Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is sitting on millions of dollars in taxpayer money rather than shifting it to the Broadcasting Board of Governors for anti-censorship work in China and other repressive regimes.
Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) wrote to Clinton on Friday after learning the BBG has yet to receive funding from the State Department. The BBG, which oversees government-sponsored international broadcasting, would like to use the money to ensure its content is accessible. The so-called Great Firewall of China, for example, is a hurdle for Voice of America’s digital efforts.
Lugar expressed disappointment that Clinton has failed to follow the advice of Congress. Democrats and Republicans have asked the State Department to give a portion to the BBG.
“Should Congress take more remedial, legislative action?” Lugar asked in the letter.
The State Department indicated last week it has $28 million remaining for Internet freedom work. Despite its pleas to Congress, the BBG is unlikely to receive any of it. That’s because Congress didn’t give State specific instructions how to spend the money in last year’s budget.
Instead, Lugar and other members of Congress have strongly encouraged Clinton to give a share of the funding to the BBG, given its work in this area.
“No doubt, the [State] Department and USAID have significant functions to play in providing training related to this issue,” Lugar wrote to Clinton. “However, when it comes to technology, given their daily struggles with China, Iran, Belarus, Syria, Venezuela and other closed societies, the BBG is our government’s leading expert on getting through electronic firewalls.”
Lugar would know. He authored a report in January on the BBG’s advances in Internet Censorship Circumvention Technology, urging the State Department to shift at least $8 million to the BBG.
Other members of Congress have suggested the BBG should receive even more money. The House-passed continuing resolution, H.R. 1, transferred $10 million to the BBG. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) wanted to shift $15 million. It’s unknown how much money will be included in the compromise deal reached by Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and President Obama late Friday. That money, however, would apply to the fiscal 2011 budget.
More than 18 months have passed since the fiscal 2010 budget was adopted by Congress. Lawmakers included $30 million for the State Department to pursue Internet freedom measures. There is still about $28 million remaining in the bank account, and it could be several more weeks before the money is spent.
Complicating matters for Clinton are recent reports that the State Department and USAID have given nearly $5 million to the BBC World Service Trust, the BBC’s international charity. The Broadcasting Board of Governors does similar work, raising even more questions about State’s funding decisions.
The ranking member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee wants to know why Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is sitting on millions of dollars in taxpayer money rather than shifting it to the Broadcasting Board of Governors for anti-censorship work in China and other repressive regimes.
Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) wrote to Clinton on Friday after learning the BBG has yet to receive funding from the State Department. The BBG, which oversees government-sponsored international broadcasting, would like to use the money to ensure its content is accessible. The so-called Great Firewall of China, for example, is a hurdle for Voice of America’s digital efforts.
Lugar expressed disappointment that Clinton has failed to follow the advice of Congress. Democrats and Republicans have asked the State Department to give a portion to the BBG.
“Should Congress take more remedial, legislative action?” Lugar asked in the letter.
The State Department indicated last week it has $28 million remaining for Internet freedom work. Despite its pleas to Congress, the BBG is unlikely to receive any of it. That’s because Congress didn’t give State specific instructions how to spend the money in last year’s budget.
Instead, Lugar and other members of Congress have strongly encouraged Clinton to give a share of the funding to the BBG, given its work in this area.
“No doubt, the [State] Department and USAID have significant functions to play in providing training related to this issue,” Lugar wrote to Clinton. “However, when it comes to technology, given their daily struggles with China, Iran, Belarus, Syria, Venezuela and other closed societies, the BBG is our government’s leading expert on getting through electronic firewalls.”
Lugar would know. He authored a report in January on the BBG’s advances in Internet Censorship Circumvention Technology, urging the State Department to shift at least $8 million to the BBG.
Other members of Congress have suggested the BBG should receive even more money. The House-passed continuing resolution, H.R. 1, transferred $10 million to the BBG. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) wanted to shift $15 million. It’s unknown how much money will be included in the compromise deal reached by Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and President Obama late Friday. That money, however, would apply to the fiscal 2011 budget.
More than 18 months have passed since the fiscal 2010 budget was adopted by Congress. Lawmakers included $30 million for the State Department to pursue Internet freedom measures. There is still about $28 million remaining in the bank account, and it could be several more weeks before the money is spent.
Complicating matters for Clinton are recent reports that the State Department and USAID have given nearly $5 million to the BBC World Service Trust, the BBC’s international charity. The Broadcasting Board of Governors does similar work, raising even more questions about State’s funding decisions.
Source



my first time visiting this blog, after I read some article that was published as a whole is very interesting & nice
ReplyDeleteI really like Hilary Clinton because I have a line of simian line like Hilary's hand on your right hand
ReplyDeleteAs a Newbie, I am always searching online for articles that can help me. There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Features also. Keep working, great job!
ReplyDeleteI like this web site and in your good working,,, but I am more information wanna see it .
ReplyDeletethank you for the good sharing and nice provide
the information for me and all the world peoples .
Thanks for sharing your ideas. I'm just glad I was been able to visit your site. Keep it up.
ReplyDeleteI'll definitely pass along word of this page. I'm SO sorry to hear about this. I've been following news of the band, as I have several friends who have told me how great they are! I love what's I've heard!
ReplyDeleteYour article is amazingly written with various viewpoints that match my own. Yours are more unique in nature than mine, but overall we think alike. Your content is really very interesting. I appreciate your style.
ReplyDeleteWho is Hillary Clinton receiving campaign funds from? What is her stance on these issues?
ReplyDeleteI think Hillary will do well
ReplyDeleteIt's all about votes for the Democrats. All you good Democrats, please leave your party. Don't brand yourself with criminality.
ReplyDeleteGreat information! I’ve been looking for something like this for a while now. Thanks!
ReplyDeleteReally I appreciate the effort you made to share the knowledge. The topic here i found was really effective to the topic which I was researching for a long time.
ReplyDeleteI used to like Hillary, but I'm not sure anymore...
ReplyDeleteThis letter is very compromising for Clinton
ReplyDeleteThis is a better-quality article as they all are. I make fun of been wonder wide this an eye to some beat now. It’s great to receive this info. You are fair and balanced.
ReplyDeletesupporters of internet freedom see the mediums anonymity as one of its greatest strengths. Proponents of stricter internet control see it as a major threat.do you agree of being anonymous on the internet (in any way such as stating onions, conversation, and so on) ?
ReplyDeleteIndeed a very nice post and I am a devoted orthodontist reader at Las Vegas.Your post is really very valuable. Thanks for sharing. keep upI should say only that its awesome! The blog is informational and always produce amazing things.Thanks for sharing. the good posting.
ReplyDeletethere are certainly many different posts at here i just have alart across your blog via google and i like it.
ReplyDeleteGreat work! I wish I could write this well!Very insightful post. I will keep an eye on your blog in the future.
ReplyDeletenursing homes
ReplyDeleteGreat information i am just looking for this kind of info.
commercial real estate software
ReplyDeleteI just found your blog and want to say thank you! What an enjoyable time looking
through so many sites. Thanks for sharing.
Popular elements of the summer, seems to have brought us into a perfect shift Juicy Couture jewelry photography works in all things such as miniatures as delicate and lovely. The sleek retro Juicy couture bags, sweet and soft cream color, everything make Juicy Couture baby bag you kind of fall into the feel of the fairy tale world. Back an exquisite and small, to start their own without the burden of a happy summer tour.
ReplyDeleteread more:
http://chengaijing0910.blog.fc2.com/
http://chengaijing0910.seesaa.net
cheapjuicycouturebagss
It was really very informative stuff. I definitely share your views to my close friends keeps up the good work going.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this article. Personally, I think this material is great. I agree with much of your information here. It also motivates me to learn more. I await the next article with great anticipation.
ReplyDelete